The Machine That Was a Man
In 1770, a Hungarian engineer announced a startling invention: a machine capable of playing chess. This “Mechanical Turk” toured the world, impressing everyone from Benjamin Franklin to Edgar Allan Poe. There was just one problem: it was not an early example of AI, but a hoax, operated by a chess master hidden within. Companies today may still take a similar approach—known as “Wizard of Oz” testing—to test user response before production. Discuss with your team: is it okay to mislead users during product testing in order to make the finished versions of those products better?
Key concepts
- Wizard of Oz Testing
- A real design method: the user is told the system is automatic, while a person behind the screen quietly works the controls — so a company can watch how people behave before building the thing that would behave that way.
+ 1 more concept inside
Every work — at a glance
-
The Mechanical Turk — Wolfgang von Kempelen (automaton)
A 1770 chess-playing automaton — a turbaned figure seated at a cabinet — that beat opponents from Benjamin Franklin to Napoleon while a hidden human chess master slid along a rail inside, working the arm.
+ 1 more work explained inside
What to know
-
01
The hoax and the method share one trick: hide a human, and let the audience believe the machine is thinking. Two and a half centuries apart the mechanism is identical — what changed is the purpose, and whether anyone is told afterwards.
+ 1 more insight inside
Across subjects
Theme connection
"Are We There Yet?"
Practice — a sample
SOCThe Mechanical Turk is to a pure hoax as Wizard of Oz testing is to —
- A A finished robot
- B A magic trick
- C A research method
- D A failed machine
- E A sales pitch
Sign in to answer and see why each option is right or wrong.
Keep reading the full lesson
The remaining insights, works, and practice come with full access — $9.99/month or $29.99/season.
Unlock full access →New here? Create a free account to read the free section.